The phrase "in which digits" is correct and usable in written English
You can use it when you want to refer to an element or aspect of something that contains numerical figures. For example, "The new phone plan has several options, each of which has a different fee structure in which digits are used to specify the cost."
It is traditionally defined as a condition in which digits II and III of the foot are bound by skin and are reduced.
This is commonly defined as a peculiar phenotype in which digits II and III of the marsupial foot are tightly connected by a common sheath of skin at least to the base of the intermediate phalanx [ 3, 4].
Specifically, rates of 0.020 0.025 are not significantly less likely than the maximum likelihood rate and yield maximum likelihood ancestral states indicating 25 cases of digit loss but no instances in which digits are gained.
Although confirming the pervasiveness of structural reduction in the evolution of squamate limb morphology (at least 70 cases of digit loss were inferred), Brandley et al.'s [ 5] analyses identified at least six instances in which digits have been reacquired, supporting Kohlsdorf and Wagner's (2006) conclusion that limb reduction may be reversible.
We also suggested that representation of the body used in the in-between task was also recruited for other intermanual sensory comparisons, in which digit representation is implicit and irrelevant (Experiment 3).
This is parallel to findings in the collared flycatcher, a sister species to the pied flycatcher, in which digit ratios were not associated with any song traits or forehead or wing patch sizes (Garamszegi et al. 2008).
You'll still have to somehow determine the correct order, but knowing exactly which digits appear in that row is a great start.
The pairing of digit and symbol was kept constant during the study, but the order in which the digits were presented in the list to be completed with symbols was different from one testing time to the next.
In his system the number 237.578 was denoted in which the digits to the left of the zero are the integral part of the number.
In this way, the trained models are less sensitive to the order in which the digits appear in the sequences.
But when the researchers repeated the test using an array in which the digits varied in size to disrupt Tammet's synesthetic sizing scheme, his performance plummeted to just 16 correct on the day of the test and zero 3 days later, according to a poster presented here 10 April at a meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.
