in validation with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in validation with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey a relationship of agreement or compliance with a validation process, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The results were confirmed in validation with the established protocols."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Soil order had good agreement in validation, with kappa coefficient of 0.41.

Geoderma

Flow rate has a direct relation to parametric value λ in validation with the results here that flow resistance increases for smaller λ-values and vice-versa.

Boundary Value Problems

Based on the error analysis, only the response t95% and recovery t95% model showed best results in validation with a low relative prediction error of 0.003 and 0.001 and low root mean square error for cross validation of 9.5 and 4.68 respectively.

Measurement

These values were selected to exploit the family structure in the data as follows: The training data set contained fathers, full- and half sibs of the bulls in validation with a max = 0.6, only half sibs with a max = 0.49, and neither of those close relatives with a max = 0.249 and 0.1249.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Sensitivity analyses were performed to compare accuracy and calibration in validations with and without these imputed values.

BMC Pediatrics

The calibration model determined drug concentration in validation blends with a root mean square error of prediction and bias below 0.1% (w/w).

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Grade was predicted in validation data with accuracies ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 using the metagene predictor, similar to what was obtained by SVM (Table 1).

BMC Cancer

The improvement is clearly seen in the orbit overlap analysis and in the validation with independent Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) measurements.

Advances in Space Research

A model-bias can only be quantified in a validation with actual observations of above-ground biomass and the predictors in a model [41, pp. 172 and 232, 42].

Carbon Balance and Management

However, albeit its use for many years, no experimental in situ validation with the actual rock mass strength has been demonstrated.

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

In the validation with an independent set the results of the qPCR data are the same: no differences between the groups but a similar trend in the data.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express that something is checked or confirmed through a validation process, use phrases like "validated against", "consistent with validation", or "during validation" for clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "in validation with" as it's grammatically awkward. Instead, rephrase to clearly indicate the relationship, such as "validated against" or "consistent with the validation results".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in validation with" functions as a prepositional phrase, attempting to link a subject with a process of validation. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrasing is not grammatically correct. This phrase aims to express a relationship where something is being confirmed or supported by a validation process, though it does so in a non-standard way.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "in validation with" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI has pointed out, while the intention is to convey a relationship of confirmation or support through a validation process, it's better to use alternatives such as "validated against", "consistent with validation", or "during validation" for clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase appears rarely and primarily in scientific contexts, but its non-standard usage makes it less desirable. To ensure clear and professional communication, opting for grammatically sound alternatives is crucial.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consistent with validation by

Indicates agreement or alignment with validation results.

during validation of

Replaces the preposition "in" with "during" to denote a timeframe, and removes "with" for grammatical correctness.

validated against

Focuses on comparison against existing item.

for validation with

Focuses on purpose; indicating what the validation is being performed in relation to.

for the validation using

Specifies validation process using certain items.

in support of validation by

Emphasizes that something is providing support to the validation process.

as part of the validation with

Highlights inclusion within validation activities.

to validate by

Focuses on the action of validating using certain methods.

during the process of validation by

Indicates the timing aspect of the validation using something else.

undergoing validation by

Describes something currently being validated with something else.

FAQs

What does "in validation with" mean?

The phrase "in validation with" is not standard English and is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It likely attempts to convey that something is confirmed or supported by a validation process, but the phrasing is unclear. Using alternatives like "validated against" or "consistent with the validation results" /s/consistent+with+the+validation+results is more appropriate.

How can I rephrase "in validation with" to be grammatically correct?

Instead of "in validation with", consider using phrases such as "validated against", "in accordance with the validation process", or "consistent with validation". The best choice depends on the specific context you want to convey. For example if you have to validate results use "results were validated".

Is "in validation with" formal or informal language?

Due to its grammatical incorrectness, "in validation with" is not appropriate for either formal or informal contexts. Opt for grammatically sound alternatives to ensure clarity and professionalism. Try using more common phrases like "supported by validation".

What are some alternatives to "in validation with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "validated against", "confirmed by validation", "in agreement with the validation results", or "consistent with the validation data". For example, "The findings are "consistent with the validation data"".