Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(1)
Furthermore, we do not believe the observed differences in distractor-related brain activity at different task loads are likely to be accounted for by different error rates as there is no significant difference in total error rates (i.e., sum of commission and omission errors) between conditions with vs. without distractors at either task load.
Similar(59)
There was no significant difference between groups in total errors for the no cue (p = .593), spatial cue (p = .351), double cue (p = .850), congruent (p = .248) and incongruent (p = .432) conditions.
The decrease in total errors in the Val/Val genotype group was significant (β = -0.47, p = 0.01).
A significant increase in total errors was seen in the scopolamine treated mice on days one and two (p < 0.05).
In total, errors in the identification/annotation of 5558 of 23,351 ESTs (24%) were discovered from the libraries listed in Table 2.
A significant increase in total errors was also seen in P. minus (50 mg/kg) treated mice on days two and three (p < 0.05).
In our study, the smoothing error was not included in the total error estimate, but the retrieved O3 profile is considered to be a smoothed representation of the true O3 profiles.
The error model results in the total error transformation matrix from which three error amplification factors are derived and used as design criteria for accuracy in the optimum design formulation with constraints on workspace and design variable limits.
However, several results related to global or regional sea level changes still too often rely on the assumption that orbit errors coming from station coordinates adoption can be neglected in the total error budget.
The main idea of the suggested methodology is to choose the nonlinearity detection tolerance so as to cause the truncation inherent error to have the most contribution in the total error.
This particular detection method provides the most sensitive approach for conventional CCB (Colloidal Coomassie Blue) stained gels, which is reflected in a total error of just 5% (RSD%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com