Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
In this commentary, we explore the central assumption of censoring.
In this commentary, we argue that the employed methodology is not viable.
In this commentary, we evaluate the current 3-year EM training programme in the Netherlands.
In this commentary, we discuss progress in discovering small molecules that induce cellularization in mammalian muscle.
In this commentary, the authors discuss two possible approaches in experimental studies.
In this commentary we argue that this assumption neglects the high-frequency capacitance Cs acting in parallel to RS.
In this commentary we reflect on theoretical, methodological, and instructional design issues.
With a few caveats discussed in this commentary, we agree with Glazier's proposal.
In this commentary, we raise issues for consideration when working with confederates.
In this commentary paper, based on solid arguments, it was demonstrated that it is not a correct conclusion.
In this commentary, we explore the strength of this design and its complexity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com