Although it has received tremendous attention in different applications, formal concept in their systematic developments are yet to be established.
This finding exceeds the overall 16.8% HO rate described by Giannoudis et al. in their systematic review [1], but likely represents our predominant use of the anterior approach.
Edwards et al. [13] stated in their systematic review that the response rate of collecting valuable data can be increased by using a shorter questionnaire.
In other words, the researchers include more genres of games and simulations in their systematic review, compared to the other literature reviews.
The topics being investigated by Brazilian research groups are partially aligned to what Dybȧ and Dingsøyr [25] found in their systematic review.
For example, Yamakawa et al. [18] reported a trend toward favorable outcomes in their systematic review based on a meta-analysis.
In their systematic mapping study, Zhang et al. (2011) noted that the most of studies in code smells focus on tools and methods for automatic detection.
In their systematic review of 25 cases of PIT, Myers et al. [2] reported that the survival of surgically managed patients was significantly better than the survival of conservatively managed patients (log-rank test, P = 0.039).
In their systematic studies, Kolan et al. (2012) tested the effects of different particle sizes of the feedstock powder and binder content on the quality of bioactive glass porous scaffolds.
Moreover, Kamath et al. suggested in their systematic review that the use of Kirshner wires or smooth pins for fixation could not achieve adequate compression, leading in some cases to bony nonunion [30].
Papadokostakis et al. [27] reviewed the merits of spanning versus non-spanning frames and found, in their systematic review, that the overall deep infection rate with non-spanning frames was 2.7%%.
