Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(17)
Both groups achieved the lowest error rates and quickest responses in the numerical task (Table 1).
Half of the subjects participated first in the numerical task and than in the physical task.
The DE was significant in all groups in the numerical task.
Adults vs. G5: p = 0.0346) differed by group in the numerical task.
The DE in the numerical task was tested using data from all three levels of congruency.
In the numerical task both facilitation and interference were significant in all groups.
Similar(43)
Consistently higher accuracy in the numerical tasks at the group level as well as dissociations with almost exclusively numerical advantages suggest the processing of single-digit numbers to be easier than the processing of isolated letters.
In contrast, there was an opposite to normal deflection of the LRP in the incongruent condition of the numerical task in grade 3, and less conspicuously in grade 5 children.
In contrast, in G3 the LRP in the incongruent condition of the Numerical task began to go into a negative direction at around 190 ms. It became more and more negative until 300 ms, than it gradually returned to the baseline until 800 ms (RT = 870 ms), and became positive.
As predicted in the literature [ 12, 13], the only exception was found in the performance of the numerical task within the subitizing range: The typical signature of the OTS ratio insensitivity was found in the range of 1 4.
Furthermore, we investigated whether response latencies (upon solving the numerical task in the scanner) correlate with signal strengths in parietal regions of interest as depicted in Figure 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com