In the first proposition, "is touch and go" can be taken as focal nucleus and "it's very superficial" as reinforcement on the same hierarchical level.
In the first proposition, "I receive information in a new way," including "Helpful information, not just the usual numbers and calculations," is the focal nucleus denoting a positive attitude toward the object group visit.
Indeed, if the third proposition is not valid, the benefit of VE expressed in the first two propositions would become insignificant for the purpose of safety learning and training.
Given the indirect manner in which hyperbolic doubt operates, there seems no clear explanation of why the doubt succeeds in undermining the first proposition but is somehow resisted by the second.
Our results are in accordance with the first proposition, since we reported only 2 graft losses in the ATG induced group and no significant difference was detected in acute rejection between patients with and without ATG induction.
Having assented in the Ellis Case to the first proposition, I cannot give my assent to the suggestion that the second proposition is consistent with the principles there laid down.
For example, in considering the structure of paragraph [2] in the Hot Air Balloon, the first proposition may be represented as Figure 2. Figure 2 The hot air balloon envelope.
The first proposition is included in the list of examples that are undermined by the Evil Genius Doubt (see fourth paragraph of Med. 3).
Once these two are distinguished, however, Clarke is open to the criticism that he cannot rule out the existence of two self-existent beings (as he attempts in the seventh proposition) because there may be two beings who are self-existent even though only one self-existent being is required to explain the existence of the world (Law 1758, 21).
In the third proposition, the focal nucleus "Time is ever too short" and the related argument "to go deep into details" further reinforce the presence of a negative attitude.
In the second proposition, the focal nucleus is "Problems are not analyzed in any detail," related arguments being "the visit itself is but a conclusion of self-monitoring" first in hierarchical order and "self-monitoring in the end is what seems to matter" in second order.
