As in the case of allocations between health and non health sectors, the resources to be distributed will typically be money, and so no direct argument that the distinctive end of what is being distributed is health seems applicable.
The algorithm gave probabilities from 0.5 (in the case of indifferent allocation to one or another group) to 0.8 (if both minimisation factors indicated allocation to the same group).
(1) Excessive allocation: as static weight assignment schemes are unaware of the current network conditions, in the case of excessive allocation, a node is given transmission opportunities typically at the cost of suppressing other nodes even if it has no packets to transmit.
It consists of a certain uncertainty in the case of the allocation of the probabilities.
In the case of optimal allocation, however, they cannot increase productivity by changing jobs anymore.
In the case of optimizing allocation time, let's assume that the channel capacity of RS k is the lowest (C k ≪ C i, i ≠ k,).
In the case of deterministic resource allocation, we assume that the resources are assigned to the VAAs in order to maximize the distance between two interfering VAAs.
In addition, in the case of optimum power allocation, the proposed system yields a lower probability of error in low SNR regimes, and the probability of error is close to the equal power allocation case in high SNR regimes.
The findings suggest that having an energy-only market at one side of the border and an energy-plus-capacity market at the other side may impede cross-border trade and result in underusage or misusage of transmission in the case of an explicit allocation of transmission capacity.
So, after finding that co-transmitting over the primary channel peaks seems to be a better choice for accessing to the primary resources, we can point out that in the case of the static allocation of resources the best interfered bit error rate we got was 1.116 × 10 6 with 21 dB, which is better than an un-interfered communication with 18 dB (3.125 × 10 5).
