Gilad Sharon adds in the book that while he insisted on not letting his father die more out of instinct and sentiment, it turned out he also had medicine on his side: the CT scan had been misread.
Agassi also wrote in the book that while he found the media's story line of the "diffident Californian versus the brash Las Vegan" "horseshit," Sampras and he were indeed different in that, for Sampras, "tennis is his job, and he does it with brio and dedication," whereas Agassi is distracted by life.
defer.add img); Check to see if there is a glossary, map, or other tool included in the book that can be referenced while reading.
He insists on returning it in person: there's a name in the book that he's come across while researching a murder that took place decades before, and he wants more information.
"How does he know he won't gamble again?" Rose's admission in the book that he bet on baseball while managing the Reds in the second half of the 1980's will not surprise Selig, who elicited a similar confession from Rose when they met in Milwaukee in November 2002.
Many times I'll see blocks of text pulled from the back of the book and while, in theory, that's not a bad idea.
It strikes me that this attitude is particularly bemusing in the book world, because while many commentators argue that we are living through a golden age of children's fiction, many of the same people also suggest that the British novel for adults is in crisis.
Parts of the play revisit information that appears in the book, with visual aids, while others provide personal touches: Wright's amused bewilderment at Saudi culture, his moral confusion interviewing sources with terrorist connections.
"By making sporadic use of Brontë's own phrases," Miranda Seymour wrote here, "Boylan succeeds in creating a book that is convincing in voice even while it tells a vivid, dramatic and richly absorbing story".
By making sporadic use of Brontë's own phrases, Boylan succeeds in creating a book that is convincing in voice even while it tells a vivid, dramatic and richly absorbing story.
Adolf Berle, writing in the Book Review, said that while the book contained "an uncomfortable degree of truth," Mills presented "an angry cartoon, not a serious picture".
