Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
"The rich should contribute to the public expense not only in proportion to their revenue," Smith writes, "but something more than in that proportion".
"The rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion," Smith writes.
But it was Adam Smith who said that the rich 'should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion'.
He saw the social and emotional toll poverty could take, and sought to increase support for the idea of redistributive taxation: "The rich should contribute to the public expence [sic], not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion".
And, although the exact rise in that proportion varied from basin to basin, all of them saw a significant increase.What caused that increase is, of course, debatable and since the second-largest percentage increase was in the Southwest Pacific, where no significant temperature rise was observed, leaping on changes in sea-surface temperature as the sole cause might be premature.
Similar(47)
There were some comments suggesting that latter fact was because the market share - that is, the sales - of Android and iOS phones were in roughly that proportion in the US specifically, but gigantically in favour of Android worldwide.
In 1950, only 40%% of the population in LAC lived in cities, while in 1990 that proportion reached 70%%.
In fact, that proportion are enrolled in school of some sort, be it college, high school, etc.
In fact that proportion stopped claiming benefits.
Intermediaries still sell about two-thirds of fund shares; in fact, that proportion is up slightly from a decade ago.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com