Sentence examples for in supplementary analyses from inspiring English sources

In supplementary analyses migraine, TTH and non-classifiable headache compared to no headache were used as dependent variables.

In supplementary analyses migraine, TTH and non-classifiable headache compared to no recurrent headache in Young-HUNT2 were used as dependent variables.

In supplementary analyses of each training method, we assessed whether familiarity with the nouns (novel-new vs. novel-old) impacted on the participants' performance by including familiarity, training mode, and their interactions as fixed factors in a linear mixed model as well as their random slopes (by participants).

In supplementary analyses, we evaluated the influence of headache status in HUNT 2 and HUNT 3 on the odds of being fRA in HUNT 3. Statistical analyses were performed with the Predictive Analytics SoftWare PASW Statisticscs version 17.0 by SPSS inc., an IBM Company (Chicago, IL).

In supplementary analyses, we analyzed the types of errors participants made with the old items when producing sentences during the course of training and test, i.e., in the blocked/random-order sentence production task in Sessions 2 and 3, and the random-order sentence production tasks at the end of the last training session and in the test session (see Table 4).

In supplementary analyses, we investigated possible relations to either obesity or thinness, by using cut-off scores for obesity (n = 211) and thinness (n = 2731).

Choice of medication (valproate vs. lithium) and diagnosis of BD-I vs. BD-II were considered as possible confounding factors in the supplementary analyses, whereas the effects of other potential confounding variables, such as medication dose or plasma level, adjunctive medications, and non-pharmacologic treatment, were not excluded.

All individuals in our main sample are already age-eligible for CPF payouts at the start of our study period; all individuals in our supplementary analyses will not be old enough to reach CPF payout eligibility age by the end of the period studied.

In these supplementary analyses, the unit of analysis was the manuscript, the dependent variable was the Deputy Editor decision (reject vs. not reject), and Deputy Editor was treated as a random effect.

In the supplementary analyses, we extended the study population to include couples with unknown socio-occupational status as a category of its own.

21 22 The value of the CDEIS as a measure of mucosal pathology depends on its reliability, which we examined in our supplementary analyses.