Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Since individual identification was not possible with the tags only identifying families, it is possible that the subsample made from each family at each time point contained individuals previously sampled, but when family size exceeded our sample size, it is also possible that some individuals at each time point were not sampled before or in subsequent samplings.
After release, 138 males (7.21%) and 86 females (9.41%) of the marked specimens were recaptured in subsequent samplings.
Similar(58)
Sampled animals were excluded in subsequent sampling events.
Although the density of most seedlings increased in subsequent sampling years, the planted species Callitris gracilis, Callitris rhomboidea, Hakea muelleriana, and Melaleuca lanceolata did not survive.
In 26.3% of the cases a previously positive farm resulted negative in a later sampling and conversely, 38 farms (9.7%) tested negative in the first sampling but resulted positive in any of the subsequent samplings.
Because of the fact that the incident events rarely (if ever) occur exactly at the time point of sampling, but somewhere in between the two subsequent samplings, and because the event leads to censoring of the subject (= no longer at risk for incident event), we can speak about interval censoring.
In order to address the issue of possible bias introduced by using these subsequent samplings for some women, we re-ran our analysis using the data from the first sampling for all subjects.
But subsequent samplings were vigorously seasoned, carefully overcooked — not quite ready to disintegrate, but no longer toothsome — and an excellent partner for the short ribs.
The average PTAS relative to time increased during the three subsequent samplings (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
During subsequent sampling visits, a GPS was used to locate the sampling points.
The effect of subsequent sampling events are additive with respect to the variance, e.g. where nH is the number of plants in the high bulk and mH is the number of reads (at this SNP) in the high sample.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com