There was no difference in strength of correlations between newly diagnosed patients and patients during follow-up.
As the subscales of Type D personality differed in strength of correlations in relation to the outcome variables, we chose to further investigate the importance of each subscale.
More profound frontal lobe thinning (both in size of area and in strength of the correlation) was found in patients with MLD on this GLM analysis, as shown in Figure 2. On 13/20 MLD patients, IQ testing was available, and in two infantile patients a developmental index was available.
Using Steiger's Z, we found that the difference in strength of the correlation between the ICECAP-O and the wellbeing measures on the one hand and between the ICECAP-O and the EQ5D on the other hand was not statistically significant (Table 2).
Correlation coefficients from the sensitivity analysis were compared to the same statistic from the primary analysis to determine whether any relevant changes in the strength of correlation had occurred with the removal of influential observations.
There were no significant differences in the strength of correlation between the two experiments (p = 0.6).
However, only few statistical differences in the strength of correlation between risk factors and level of offending were found between the three groups.
Although we observe a reduction in the strength of correlation between the GC* ∼ RRmax and GC* ∼ RRmax|LDT models, the amplitude of this reduction varies among species (table 2).
