Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

in sets of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in sets of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to grouping items or elements together in specific quantities or arrangements. Example: "The books were organized in sets of five on the shelf."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were grouped in sets of two.

News & Media

The New Yorker

More personalities manifested themselves — each time in sets of three.

There is a protocol, firing bullets in sets of three.

News & Media

The New York Times

The diagnoses result in sets of STS practices.

Instead of doing pushups in sets of 20, he did sets of 25.

They made us count down for them so that they could race, in sets of two.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Slowly, he draws attention to your breath, which you count in sets of ten.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Coasters, in sets of four, are $10 for vinyl, $20 for linen.

News & Media

The New York Times

The money was to be made more in sets of prints than in individual sheets.

The glasses, in sets of two for $29.90, are sold at Bloomingdale's and by culinaryoutfitters.com.

The tableware is priced as open stock, with plates sold in sets of four; $12.99.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in sets of", ensure the quantity is clearly defined and relevant to the context. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity. For example, specify "in sets of three" rather than just "in sets".

Common error

Avoid using "in sets of" without specifying the number, which can cause confusion. Instead of saying "arrange the items in sets", specify "arrange the items in sets of four" to provide precise instructions.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in sets of" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating how elements are grouped or arranged. Ludwig examples show this across various contexts. It specifies a structured organization, clarifying the quantity within each group, as also stated by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in sets of" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote grouping items in specific quantities. Ludwig AI confirms it is grammatically correct and widely used across diverse fields, including News & Media, Science, Academia, Encyclopedias, and Wiki sources. When writing, clarity is key: always specify the quantity (e.g., "in sets of three"). Alternatives such as "in groups of" or "arranged in" can be suitable depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis. The prevalence and consistent usage supported by examples available on Ludwig underscores its importance in clear and precise communication.

FAQs

How can I use "in sets of" in a sentence?

You can use "in sets of" to describe how items are grouped together. For example, "The chairs were arranged "in sets of four"" or "The data was analyzed "in sets of ten"".

What are some alternatives to saying "in sets of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in groups of", "arranged in", or "divided into", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "in sets of" and "in groups of"?

While similar, "in sets of" often implies a more structured or predetermined arrangement, whereas "in groups of" can be more general and less formal.

When is it best to use "in sets of" over other similar phrases?

Use "in sets of" when you want to emphasize that items are intentionally and consistently grouped in specific quantities. This is especially useful when describing instructions, specifications, or experimental designs.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: