Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Highly significant differences (P < 0.01) in root damage occurred between the SSD lines.
Similar(59)
Also, generalized symmetrical sensory loss is not seen in spinal root damage.
Moreover, five genes that are predicted in the corresponding M. truncatula genome interval are likely candidates involved in reducing the root damage caused by nematodes.
We predicted that island plants would exhibit greater mortality and lower fecundity in response to root damage than their mainland counterparts.
Turner [8] found that Cd2+ might increase Zn2+ uptake in some plants as a result of root damage in the higher Cd2+.
Despite these obvious signs of severe root damage in island and mainland treatment plants, mainland survivors of both species displayed complete compensation after root damage.
We used three approaches to compare these traits in island and mainland populations of two native California forbs: 1) Eschscholzia californica populations were assayed to compare alkaloid deterrents, 2) captive gophers were used to test the palatability of E. californica roots and 3) simulated root herbivory assessed tolerance to root damage in Deinandra fasciculata and E. californica.
By combining the natural and artificial damage-elicited VOC profiles we identified those sulfur-containing compounds that serve as markers for root damage in each plant species.
There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of root damage and resorption between all groups (p = 0.89 and 0.89 respectively), indicating that root damage or resorption were no confounding parameters of influence in the analysis of any group.
To prove that the range of observed root damage in the parents and population lines was due to different levels of tolerance rather than resistance, P. neglectus DNA was quantified in the roots of previously scored lines.
In all groups some root damage was observed; three samples out of the empty group (n = 10), five samples out of the EMD group (n = 10), and six out of the CaP/EMD group (n = 10).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com