in review

USAGE SUMMARY

"in review" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to refer to the act of reviewing or evaluating something. For example, "We spent the last two weeks in review, and we have now come to a decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Week in Review, PAGE 11.

The New York Times

Press In Review- Football sagas.

The New Yorker

[Week in Review, 1].

The New York Times

More of the year in review.

The New Yorker

Sunday vs. Week in Review Q.

The New York Times

Week in Review, Page 12.

The New York Times

(See Art in Review, Page 37).

The New York Times - Arts

WEEK IN REVIEW Whose Interests at Heart?

The New York Times

WEEK IN REVIEW The War Widow Pfc.

The New York Times

-- The Week in Review, Aug. 17).

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

JibJab's annual year-in-review is here.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in review", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being reviewed and by whom. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "in review" vaguely. Instead of saying "the project is in review", specify what aspects are being assessed, such as "the budget is in review" or "the design is in review".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in review" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate a state of evaluation or assessment. As Ludwig AI explains, it is a correct and commonly used phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in review" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase, indicating that something is currently being evaluated or assessed. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. Its communicative purpose is to inform that a process of examination is underway, often implying that a decision is pending. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts, followed by scientific publications. While similar phrases like "under consideration" and "being assessed" exist, "in review" maintains a versatile and professional tone suitable for various communication needs. When employing the phrase, clarity is key: specify what exactly is "in review" to avoid ambiguity. Thus, "in review" is a reliable and straightforward choice for conveying the status of evaluation processes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

under consideration

This alternative emphasizes the act of carefully thinking about something before making a decision.

being assessed

Focuses on the formal evaluation process.

under evaluation

Highlights the process of judging the value or quality of something.

being examined

Stresses the thorough investigation aspect.

subject to scrutiny

Implies a detailed and critical inspection.

up for discussion

Indicates that the topic is open for debate and consideration.

pending approval

Highlights that a decision is awaiting a formal endorsement.

being revised

Emphasizes the act of making changes and improvements.

for reconsideration

Suggests that something is being looked at again, often to change a previous decision.

on the table

Indicates that a topic is currently being discussed or considered.

FAQs

How can I use "in review" in a sentence?

You can use "in review" to indicate that something is currently being examined or evaluated. For example, "The manuscript is currently "under review" by the editorial board".

What are some alternatives to saying "in review"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "under consideration", "being assessed", or "under evaluation".

Is it correct to say "the matter is in review"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. However, it's often more precise to specify what aspect of the matter is being reviewed. For instance, "the legal implications are "under scrutiny"" provides more clarity.

What is the difference between "in review" and "under review"?

While both phrases are very similar, "under review" is generally more common and often implies a formal process of evaluation. "In review" can sometimes be used more broadly to simply mean something is being looked at again, which is similar to "for reconsideration".