Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"in remote future" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English.
You might use it to talk about something that might happen in the distant future, such as: "Researchers are speculating about the potential consequences of global warming in remote future."
Exact(1)
Despite the possible prospects in remote future, we have to agree with Humphrey et al. (2000) and recognise that car parts manufacturing has no potential in terms of promoting Russian companies' integration into these GVCs, all other conditions being equal.
Similar(59)
"Set in a remote future and composed in an English nobody ever spoke or wrote, this short, swiftly paced tale juxtaposes preliterate fable and Beckettian wit, Boschian monstrosities and a hero with Huck Finn's heart and charm, lighting by El Greco and jokes by Punch and Judy, Benjamin DeMottt wrote on the front page of The New York Times Book Review.
That may be why some economists feel that the issue has been captured by economically illiterate climatologists who do not seem to understand that mitigating climate change means spending real money now in exchange for uncertain benefits in a remote future.
Frequently, biological samples are stored without specific plans for analysis and because testing may take place in the remote future (years, even decades in the future) it cannot be anticipated what tests it will be possible to conduct.
The Dorsai books, set in a remote future, portray different genetic offshoots of humanity.
It may concern a situation in the remote future and will accordingly not be very illuminating.
Its results usually relate to and will prove right or wrong in the remote future.
In the remote future (2068 2098), variability decreases and our simulations suggest a decrease of water availability of −15% to −30%.
The field deals primarily with the state of the universe in the remote future as based on extrapolations of cosmological models and the assumption that the presently known laws of physics will remain indefinitely valid.
However, third, lack of particular knowledge of future people as individuals does not stand in the way of attributing to them welfare rights, such as a right to subsistence.[4] When we consider which natural-resource policy presently living people ought to adopt, we cannot possibly be guided by obligations to concrete (genetically identifiable) people living in the (remote) future.
The danger from climate change is not in some remote future: it's here, it's now, and our generation, not some vague "future generation" is in serious, serious trouble.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com