Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
There appear to be lots of other examples: e.g., in reasoning we pretty often follow certain inference rules like modus ponens, disjunctive syllogism, etc., without necessarily explicitly representing them.
Similar(59)
In order to assess whether changes in spatial thinking predicted changes in mathematics reasoning, we used multiple linear regressions to predict change in math accuracy.
Perhaps, in the interests of precision and clarity, in serious reasoning we should replace the elusive "if" with its neat, close relative, ⊃.
In individual reasoning we do not normally regard the fact that we decided one way in the past as raising some presumption that we should decide the same way in the future.
In our reasoning, we demonstrated that the hetero interface, which were produced by cation exchanges that caused a lower lattice symmetric structure, attributed to the heterogeneous hexagonal shell growth.
According to Hume's argument, since in causal reasoning we take our past observations to serve as evidence for judgments regarding what will happen in relevantly similar circumstances in the future, causal reasoning depends on the assumption that the future course of nature will resemble the past; and there is no non-circular justification of this essential assumption.
In order to make a better understanding of the concept of disease-oriented LR and category-oriented LR in diagnostic reasoning, we first outline two clinical scenarios below.
In order to examine the direction of information transmission between regions known from previous studies to be involved in transitive reasoning, we compared the transitive reasoning task to a very similar memory task, which served as the control condition.
His claim is rather that such experience has a role to play in justifying the patterns of use we make of the demonstrative in reasoning that we engage in where such reasoning reflects our grasp of the criteria of identity of the object referred to, which in turn reflects our grasp of the object as being mind-independent.
This confirmation bias is one of the most powerful traps in reasoning because we all like to be right, and we prefer to be consistent.
They are essentially groundless (they are not grounded in empirical observation or in reasoning), for we cannot first identify an emotion or sensation in our brain or mind.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com