Sentence examples for in quality of papers from inspiring English sources

We specified the main outcome as the increment in quality of papers as measured on the Goodman Scale.

Primary outcome was defined as the difference in the quality of papers between the initial and final submission, expressed as the sum of the 36 specific MQAI items, resulting in a minimum of 36 (lowest quality) and a maximum of 180 points.

Since his first visit in 2008, he'd noted "a really steep increase both in the quantity and quality" of papers in his field, he says.

The suggestion of adding a methodological expert to the reviewers pool of a Spanish biomedical journal gave us the chance to conduct a masked, randomized experiment to assess the effect of peer review, not only without interfering with the regular course of the editorial process, but also describing more realistically the true role of peer reviewing in improving the quality of papers.

The data were selected, extracted and analysed by an investigator (MSc in Psychology) and the quality of papers was evaluated in terms of the quality of journals they were published (journals indexed for Medline and peer-reviewed papers) (Additional file 1: Annexe 1 and Additional file 2: Annexe 2).

The overall goal of the workshop was to provide an understanding of the journal review process in detail in order to improve the quality of papers submitted to scientific journals.

Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Robert Kirkpatrick for this special issue as well as the peer reviewers who took much time and effort to ensure the quality of papers in this journal.

The reporting quality of papers in obstetrics and gynaecology is improving.

The quality of papers in the shared governance literature was mid-grade.

The main issue is not the quality of papers in CVIR and JVIR but, rather, their lower impact factor.

The Frontier's review system is designed not so much to select papers as to improve the quality of papers in a collaborative, interactive dialog between authors (whose identities and affiliations are available to reviewers) and reviewers (who at this stage of the process are anonymous).