Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
They were expressed in percentage of differences related to the (P_{{{text{aw}}_{text{th}} }}) (%ΔP aw and %Δi).
Similar(59)
Findings suggest significant differences in percentage of AWL vocabulary and use of nominal modification, but no significant difference in features traditionally associated with readability.
Chi-square test showed no differences in percentage of high expression of ER, PGR and Skp2 in the different histological subtypes.
The most significant differences are observed in the percentage of fat, whereas differences in percentage of protein are smaller.
The difference in percentage of change between groups at week 3 was significantly differed.
ap < 0.05 for differences in percentage of infants or daily intakes between ABF and NBF.
Paired t-tests were used to evaluate differences in percentage of lever-presses.
Our data indicated no differences in percentage of follicle numbers before and after cryopreservation.
We tested for differences in percentage of correct choices between the conditions using a Friedman test.
bp < 0.05 for differences in percentage of energy intakes between ABF and NBF.
Otherwise the differences in percentage of missing values between the intervention groups were not significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com