Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
What producers like best, we hear, is the kind of review that puts the nice things first and buries the not-so-nice ones (if they have to be mentioned at all) in paragraphs three and four.
The nurse who alerted the hospital authorities to the scandal is quoted in paragraph three.
Suffice it to note in passing that the Mail's editorial sells the pass in paragraph three when it says of the budget: "Admittedly, it could have been worse".
In an almost offhand manner, it adds in paragraph three: "The agent then fired his service weapon several times, striking one subject who later died".
This result was represented as Figure 5D in the revised manuscript, and explained in paragraph three, subheading "Effect of IREF-2 on viral RNA synthesis in infected cells" in the revised manuscript.
This result was newly added as Figure 5D in the revised manuscript, and explained in paragraph three, subheading "Effect of IREF-2 on viral RNA synthesis in infected cells".
It was right there in paragraph eight.
It says so right there in paragraph two".
So Orwell exposes himself right there in paragraph two.
An editing error in paragraph four had made Kladovo a third player in the match.
As in paragraph two, start with a topic sentence and support that claim with concrete examples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com