Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
About the only time anyone had to reflect was the time between when we put in our reply brief and the time the appeals court stayed the decision.
These are discussed in depth in our text and in our reply to Eugene Koonin's comments.
As mentioned in our reply above, this is technically challenging and beyond the scope of the present paper.
As in our reply to point 2, we took all these suggestions from the reviewers when revising our manuscript.
This is another insightful point by the Reviewer, which we have also addressed in our reply to the Major Comments.
The discussion about biological relevance of sex→asex transitions may also be found in our reply to Arcady Mushegian.
Similar(43)
petition here, and our reply in support of our cert.
"The lesson we have learned is that there's going to be more personal computing in our lives," he replied.
As for the collective approbation from 25 nations: "They should take a leaf out of our book on sustaibability, since we are very diligent in our fisheries," he replied.
"Jaysh al Islam does not intervene in the judiciary body in our areas," he replied.
"It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country," Clinton replied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com