in orders

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in orders" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something related to "orders," but without additional context, it is unclear how to use it appropriately. Example: "The items were shipped in orders that were placed last week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"We did this over a period of about three weeks, putting in orders every several days".

The New York Times

The chiefs help with how to put in orders or deal with systemic problems" (Group 2).

BMC Medical Education

Give yourself plenty of time to take in orders, order shirts and distribute them.

WikiHow

Meanwhile, customers can phone in orders.

The New York Times - Tech

The result is a drop in orders.

The New York Times

The decline in orders was broad based.

The New York Times

"When things are good, they drown in orders.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

Walk-in orders will be welcome, too.

The New York Times

Available starting at 9 30 a.m.; Frances also takes call-in orders.

Los Angeles Times

McDonald's has a little known feature called Call-In Orders.

WikiHow

Some county health departments require mail-in orders only.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "in orders" in formal writing. Instead, clarify your intended meaning with more precise language such as "in sequence", "according to instructions", or other alternatives that clearly convey order or arrangement.

Common error

Using "in orders" can lead to ambiguity. Ensure your phrasing is clear and direct to avoid misinterpretation. For instance, instead of saying "the steps should be executed in orders", specify "the steps should be executed sequentially" or "according to the instructions".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in orders" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, attempting to modify a verb or noun by indicating arrangement or sequence. However, Ludwig AI considers the phrase to be grammatically incorrect, leading to ambiguity in its intended function.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

37%

Wiki

26%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "in orders" is considered grammatically incorrect and ambiguous. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that while it appears in some contexts like news and media and scientific articles, it lacks the precision required for formal writing. Its intended meaning, often related to sequence or arrangement, is better conveyed through alternatives such as "in sequence", "according to instructions", or "as directed". Therefore, writers should avoid using "in orders" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in the correct order

Specifies that the order is accurate or intended.

in proper sequence

Similar to 'in sequence', but emphasizes correctness and appropriateness.

in sequence

Highlights the arrangement of items or events following a specific order.

in turn

Indicates that actions or events happen one after another.

sequentially

Emphasizes the ordered progression of steps or events.

as directed

Similar to 'according to instructions', but more concise and direct.

according to instructions

Focuses on adherence to a set of guidelines or commands.

systematically

Emphasizes a structured and methodical approach.

in accordance with

Highlights conformity to rules, standards, or instructions.

pursuant to

A more formal alternative to 'according to', often used in legal or official contexts.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "in orders" correctly?

The phrase "in orders" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and can be ambiguous. It's better to use more precise alternatives like "in sequence", "according to instructions", or "as directed" depending on the context.

What are some alternatives to "in orders" that I can use?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "sequentially", "in sequence", "according to instructions", or "as directed".

Is "in orders" a formal or informal phrase?

Given its grammatical ambiguity and lack of widespread acceptance, "in orders" is not suitable for formal writing. Opt for clearer and more precise alternatives in professional or academic contexts.

What does "in orders" mean?

The meaning of "in orders" can be unclear. It might refer to a specific sequence, adherence to instructions, or the state of being arranged properly. Clearer phrasing is always recommended to avoid confusion.