in ordered of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in ordered of" is not correct in English.
The correct expression is "in order of," which is used to indicate a sequence or arrangement based on a specific criterion. Example: "The items were arranged in order of their importance to the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

According to [28] there are four steps to implement the structural risk minimization (see section Structural risk minimization), of which the first step is to choose a class of functions with hierarchy of nested subsets in ordered of the complexity.

Journal of Cloud Computing

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

(Players are listed in order of merit).

The New York Times

In order of age?

The Guardian - Music

Listed in order of preference.

The New York Times - Food

In Order of Disappearance is out now.

The Guardian - Film

That is done in order of seniority.

The New York Times

Rank these in order of preference.

The New York Times

He lists them, in order of importance.

The Guardian - Tech

Teams listed in order of projected finish.

The Guardian - Sport

Listed in order of preference in each category.

The New York Times - Food

Impressions of three hyperconvenience foods follow, in order of preference.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "in order of" instead of "in ordered of". The former is the grammatically correct and widely accepted form.

Common error

Avoid using "ordered of" as it is grammatically incorrect. Remember that "order" in this context requires the preposition "of" and should not be mistaken for a verb form requiring a different construction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in ordered of" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct phrase is "in order of", which functions as a prepositional phrase indicating sequence or arrangement.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "in ordered of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct and commonly used alternative is "in order of". Although some sources may contain the erroneous phrase, especially in informal contexts, it is crucial to use the correct grammatical form in both written and spoken English. Remember that "in order of" serves to indicate a specific sequence or arrangement based on a given criterion, making it essential to choose the right preposition for clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in order of

Corrects the grammatical error by using the standard and correct prepositional phrase.

arranged by

Suggests a specific arrangement or sorting based on a criterion.

sorted by

Implies a systematic organization based on a particular attribute.

classified by

Indicates categorization according to specific rules or criteria.

ranked by

Specifies an ordering based on a hierarchical scale or rating.

according to

Highlights an ordering based on information provided by a source.

by means of

Signifies a method or way of achieving a particular order.

following the sequence of

Refers to a strict chronological or logical progression.

in sequence of

Suggests a strict chronological or logical progression

following

Suggests an arrangement that adheres to a set of guidelines.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "in ordered of"?

The correct phrase is "in order of". This phrase is used to indicate a sequence or arrangement based on a specific criterion.

How can I use "in order of" in a sentence?

You can say, for example, "The presentations will be held in order of seniority" or "Please arrange the books in order of publication date".

What are some alternatives to "in order of"?

Alternatives include "arranged by", "sorted by", or "classified by", depending on the specific context.

Is "in ordered of" ever correct?

No, "in ordered of" is not grammatically correct. You should always use "in order of".