We therefore controlled for order of task completion in testing Hypothesis 1. Hypothesis 1 was not supported: there was no significant interaction between hunger and prime on the number of fruits chosen in the food preference task (Table 2).
It is possible that its difficulty and completion later in the laboratory visit could have introduced more measurement error if there were systematic differences in the order of task presentation (i.e., children were more fatigued or distracted following the Go/No-Go task).
All the heuristics, except FFDO, group the tasks into sequential and parallel tasks and sort each group in a decreasing order of task utilization.
Participants completed the four tasks in a single experimental sitting with order of tasks balanced across participants by a Latin square design.
Systematically approach each task in order of priority and don't go onto the next task until the previous one is complete.
Rank the tasks in order of difficulty, or in order of urgency, depending on the tasks.
For example, if individuals' beliefs about their capabilities relevant to a given task predict their behaviour, then their behaviour may be changed if they work through a series of tasks graded in order of increasing difficulty.
This feature is particularly appreciated and has been widely exploited, for example, in intelligence or developmental tests, and also in rehabilitation outcome measurement where recovery is understood in terms of the re-acquiring, in an expected order, of tasks or functions of different levels of difficulty.
Because multitasking can be overwhelming to people with chemo brain, it helps to list tasks in order of their priority and concentrate on one at a time.
Rank the following administrative tasks in order of importance.
