Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
It means the identified complex sets in low layers match the first layer of hierarchical protein complexes better than those in high layers.
Seen from the blue line, it is obvious when comparing with the first layer that the F-score values of identified complex sets in low layers (λ_th ≤ 1) are much higher than those in high layers (λ_th ≥ 4).
On the contrary, seen from the red line, the identified complex sets in high layers (λ_th = 4 or λ_th = 8) match the second layer better than those in low layers (λ_th ≤ 2).
Similar(57)
One explanation for these different results may be that p63 is extensively present in low layer of epidermal tongue [ 33], and that ΔNp63 depress 14-3-3σ 14-3-3σ 14-3-3σ] by controlling thexpressioning site of 14-3-3σ.
One advantage of this approach is that in the low layer only requires adding an extra term in the cost function of the existing NMPC controllers.
A stable stratification and a weak wind in the low layer cause the flow to move over the mountain in close to hydrostatic equilibrium (i.e., dw/dt ≈ 0).
It means the identified complex set in the low layer matches the first layer of the hierarchical known complexes better than the second layer, but with the identified complex set in high layer the opposite is the case.
This layered structure has a major influence on fluid migration, causing flow in high permeability layers to be generally parallel to the direction of bedding, while flow in low permeability layers is perpendicular to bedding (Freeze and Witherspoon 1967).
Fluid flow in low permeability layers shows characteristics of low-velocity non-Darcy flow.
Continuous CO2 flooding cannot displace much of remaining oil in low permeability layers due to high mobility of CO2 and serious heterogeneity.
Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can deliver a remarkable complexity savings and coding efficiency improvement on coding a frame in low temporal layers of the hierarchical P structure.
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com