in litigation to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in litigation to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a legal context, but it lacks clarity and completeness. Example: "The company is currently in litigation to resolve the contract dispute."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

Town officials said such a declaratory judgment could be used in litigation to invalidate the referendum.

The New York Times

What this means is that there is enough here for the banks to fight in litigation to kill this deal.

The New York Times

The club's current president, Dianne Bernhard, said it had spent $923,900 in legal fees in the last year, largely in litigation to get rid of Mr. James.

The New York Times

After he lost most of his money in litigation to protect his patent, Kay moved to France, where he is said to have died in obscurity.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Court rules require people in litigation to deal directly with each other's lawyers and not to independently approach people on the other side.

The New York Times

"We can use the F.C.C. item today in litigation to show we should be able to upgrade" our lines, he said.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

She determined early on in the litigation to stop the Florida recount, and in the five-to-four decision that followed, her vote was decisive.

The New York Times

He persuaded Terrence McCartney, a New York lawyer who had experience in PPA litigation, to help.

The New York Times

Ms. Karbowiak, the Firestone spokeswoman, said it was common in business litigation to keep settlement agreements private.

The New York Times

Wachovia is following a similar strategy in its litigation to escape financing the Clear Channel/Providence transaction.

The New York Times

Mr. Blum, a former investment broker and now a visiting fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, likened his role in the litigation to being "Yenta the matchmaker".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing legal actions, use precise and grammatically correct phrasing such as "in legal proceedings to" or "engaged in litigation for" to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "in litigation to" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, clarify the sentence structure by specifying the purpose or reason for the litigation using phrases like "for the purpose of" or "in order to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in litigation to" acts as a prepositional phrase, but its grammatical structure is flawed. While it appears in various sources, Ludwig AI flags it as not conveying a clear meaning and suggests alternatives for improved clarity. It often aims to express purpose within a legal context.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

26%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "in litigation to" appears in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase does not convey a clear meaning and should be replaced with more precise alternatives such as "in legal proceedings to" or "engaged in litigation for". When writing about legal matters, prioritize accuracy and clarity by using grammatically sound phrasing to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in legal proceedings to

This alternative provides a more formal and grammatically correct way to express involvement in legal actions.

to pursue litigation for

This alternative emphasizes the active pursuit of legal action.

involved in a lawsuit to

This alternative clearly indicates participation in a specific legal case.

engaged in litigation for

This alternative describes active participation in legal proceedings with a specific purpose.

to initiate litigation for

Focuses on starting or beginning legal action.

litigating in order to

This alternative uses the verb form of 'litigation' to express purpose.

in court to

This alternative provides a more concise way to indicate legal action.

to file a lawsuit to

Focuses on the formal act of initiating legal proceedings.

in a legal battle to

This alternative conveys a sense of conflict and struggle within the legal context.

undergoing litigation to

Emphasizes the experience of being subjected to legal proceedings.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "in litigation to" for better clarity?

You can use phrases like "in legal proceedings to", "engaged in litigation for", or "involved in a lawsuit to" to improve clarity and grammatical correctness.

What's a more formal way to say "in litigation to"?

A more formal way to express this is "in legal proceedings to" or "to pursue litigation for", which are both grammatically sound and suitable for professional contexts.

Is "in litigation to" grammatically correct?

The phrase "in litigation to" is not grammatically correct. It is recommended to use more precise and grammatically sound alternatives such as "in legal proceedings to" or rephrase the sentence for better clarity.

What is the difference between "in litigation to" and "engaged in litigation for"?

While both phrases relate to legal action, "in litigation to" is grammatically awkward. "Engaged in litigation for" is a more grammatically correct and clearer way to express active participation in legal proceedings with a specific purpose.