"in light of the points" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to mean in consideration of, or in accordance with, what has been previously stated or discussed. For instance, you could say: "In light of the points we discussed earlier, I believe we should move forward with the project."
In the absence of matches, and in light of the points below, a 401(k) might not make sense at all.
In light of the points discussed above, some comments about these studies follow.
Moreover, the interactional nature of FGs allows participants to clarify or expand on their contributions during the discussion in light of the points raised by the other participants.
Perhaps, in light of the point about how use determines meaning, the fact that our use of the sentences is not ontologically committing should cast doubt on any semantics of these sentences given which they are.
Cognitive (ICT-Based) Interfaces to/for Complexity – What forms of emerging digital interfaces can help engage with our body and its dynamics (in light of the 3 points above) in increasingly effective ways?
There is nothing in the decision-making process (scientific or otherwise) that prohibits the ability to challenge consensus or pursue alternative views of a question in light of the data points presented.
In light of the above points, unidentified ANK repeat binding proteins will likely be difficult to predict simply based on amino acid sequences, although a firm conclusion awaits detailed characterizations of more ankyrin binding targets.
Discussion Again, broaden the discussion and cite paper also in light of the above points: Cite some experimental verified interaction results and papers describing them, speak about different definitions to define PPI networks - and convince the reader more about the selected interactions you think are probably new and should be there.
In light of these points, in the fifth section, I explore how regulation might offer a good balance between the need to widen therapeutic access to new treatments and the need to gain scientific information.
In light of these points we have now updated the Results section of our manuscript to highlight that this animal provides fewer data than the other three.
(In light of the last point, this is sometimes referred to as the 'classical republican' or 'neo-roman' tradition in political thought).
