We assessed the sensitivity of our findings instead using a continuous measure of physician spending, which was separately included in the model in lags of one year, two years, and three years.
The results show that there is no significant difference in lag phase of two types of yeast.
Therefore this method may have potential to investigate the distribution in lag times of different cell populations [13].
This type of variability in LAG spacing between elements of a single individual is also evident in other fossil studies.
By limiting the duration in lag, excessive computation of the cross bilinear product is avoided.
In particular, a lag of 0 resulted in a peak year further into the future, whereas a lag of 15 years moved the peak closer to present time.
This influence does not directly result in the time lag of GEC to EUV.
In our study, lag of time between measurement of risk factors and death was up to 32 years.
Attributed effects are changes in phase lags of individual constituents leading to a different tidal modulation, thus additionally increasing tidal water levels.
From the results of the lag analysis, we included a lag of -1 in these models.
