Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
In items three and four, LT.
Elsewhere, an extreme dissatisfaction was noted in items five six and sevenn (32.2%, 21.5% and 35% respectively).
In item three, dealing with swelling, the response alternatives in the original version were "none", "only evenings" and "constant".
If we were the fantasy mentioned in item two would crumble fast, because "The Lean Belly Prescription" would probably be revealed to have sold a thousand times as many copies as "The Autobiography of Mark Twain: Vol. 1".
In item four, dealing with stair-climbing, the response alternatives in the original version were "no problems", "impaired" and "impossible".
In item seven, respondents were required to list four characteristics of randomised controlled trials that would increase their confidence that the research was methodologically sound.
In addition to BISOC items, three more items were added to the scale.
In 'recommended' items, five of eight were present but three of them did not include full information (table 1).
The process would result in items with three or more response options.
No item was identified by all of the resources, one item appeared in five lists, four items appeared in four lists, three items appeared in 17 lists and the remainder of the items appeared in only one or two lists (Table 1).
Four items in two constructs exhibited model-to-data misfit and/or a low score-measure correlation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com