The phrase "in future proceedings" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a set of events or activities in the future, especially litigation or negotiations. For example, "The defendant was ordered to pay damages in the current proceedings, and will be liable for any additional damages resulting from future proceedings."
Because the Court of Appeals lacked appellate jurisdiction, its reading of the investors' litigation position is not binding in future proceedings and is open to consideration on remand.
But she added that the company "respectfully disagrees, however, with certain of the preliminary findings contained in the court's opinion, and expects to have the opportunity to more fully respond to those findings in future proceedings".
The court declined to hear arguments on whether the prohibition on the use of information acquired through torture had acquired this status and it is likely that this issue will figure more prominently in future proceedings.
He made his plea as part of a bargain with the special Watergate prosecutor, Archibald Cox, under which Dean agreed to be a prosecution witness in future proceedings against alleged participants in the cover‐up — including, potentially, against President Nixon.
Some patent attorneys suspect, however, that government lawyers may sidestep the big issues in future proceedings.
No fines were issued, though a Verizon Wireless spokesman says the court may still levy them in future proceedings.
Because issuance of the writ is vested in the discretion of the court to which to petition is made, this Court leaves it to the Court of Appeals to address the parties arguments and other matters bearing on whether mandamus should issue, bearing in mind the burdens imposed on the Executive Branch in any future proceedings.
In telling the appeals court to be "mindful of the burdens imposed on the executive branch in any future proceedings," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's majority opinion, implicitly but not definitively, rejected the Bush administration's position that the vice president's activities should not be subject to pretrial discovery at all.
The person making the complaint (described here as the 'originator') must sign and date their report and be prepared, if necessary, to be identified in any future proceedings.
