Sentence examples for in exploration time from inspiring English sources

The distinction between F and N in T2 was measured by comparing the time spent in exploring the F with that spent in exploring the N. DI is the dissimilarity index and represents the difference in exploration time expressed as a proportion of the total time spent exploring the two objects in T2.

We defined this ratio as the difference in exploration time for the displaced or novel object divided by total exploration time.

2) Second, it is curious that the loss of discrimination between familiar and novel stimuli in the novel object test is a decrease in exploration time for the novel stimulus more so that an increase in exploration time for the familiar stimulus.

The first measure (D1) was the difference in exploration time for novel versus familiar objects, that is, the exploration time devoted to the novel object minus the time devoted to the familiar object.

The second measure (D2) used the difference in exploration time (i.e., D1), but then divided D1 by the total amount of exploration given to both the novel and familiar objects.

One-way ANOVA confirmed that this difference in exploration times was significant, [ F 2,14) = 2122.70, p < 0.001].

Furthermore, inspection of individual trials from the present study highlighted the variability in exploration times given to particular objects.

The second measure (D2) also uses the difference in exploration times (i.e., D1), but then divides D1 by the total duration of exploration given to both the novel and familiar objects, so adjusting for overall levels of exploration.

The D2 index also uses the difference in exploration times between the novel object and the familiar object (i.e., D1), but then divides D1 by the total duration of exploration given to both the novel and familiar objects.

The second measure (D2) also uses the difference in exploration times (i.e., D1), but then divides D1 by the total duration of exploration given to both the novel and familiar objects.

Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions were severely impaired at discriminating a novel object from a simultaneously presented familiar object (direct test), yet displayed normal levels of exploration to novel objects presented on their own and showed normal declines in exploration times for familiar objects that were repeatedly presented (indirect tests).