Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
There are two broad approaches in evaluating research and researchers: traditional methods of peer assessment used for publishing, grant proposals and promotion purposes; and the newer use of citation metrics for comparative evaluation.
This document specifies the criteria that reviewers must use in evaluating research grant applications.
Since then the Commission Services have gained various experiences in evaluating research.
This checklist provides an itemization of important areas for the reader to consider in evaluating research articles.
This situation has attracted fierce criticism, including a recent international petition [11] calling on the world scientific community to eliminate the role of the journal impact factor in evaluating research for funding, hiring and promotion.
I will reserve detailed discussion of ALMs for future posts, but the simple answer is that journal impact factors should not be used in evaluating research.
Similar(52)
Applicants stand to gain the benefits of conceptualization and refinement of their ideas, as discussed above, while reviewers gain experience in critically evaluating research and providing constructive criticism.
Peer review is also called upon by agencies funding research in the process of evaluating research proposals in regard to funding.
Traditional peer review usually places the significance of biomedical research objectives highest, in terms of importance, when evaluating research proposals in the biomedical sciences.
Now impact factors have become a dominant means of evaluating research importance in science: In effect, science is evaluated by the journals in which it is published.
a proficiency in both reading and evaluating research literature.
More suggestions(17)
in exploring research
in identifying research
in conducting research
in interpreting research
in discussing research
in undertaking research
in analyzing research
in evaluating scientists
in evaluating investigational
in testing research
in evaluating issues
in the assessment of research
to assessing research
in assessing research
for assessing research
in evaluation research
in assessment research
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com