Sentence examples for in each cue from inspiring English sources
In the obese but not lean individuals, HOMA-IR values correlated positively with neural activations in corticolimbic-striatal regions in each cue condition.
As a group, the birds did not choose the correct cup more often than expected by chance neither with the two gaze cues (Wilcoxon: Z = −0.137, P > 0.999), nor in each cue condition separately (proximal: one-sample t-test: T = 0.791, df = 5, P = 0.465; distal: Wilcoxon: Z = 0.970, P = 0.438).
The RT data from threat trials in the spatial cueing task were adjusted by subtracting the slowing (or speeding) effect of threat cues on RTs (i.e., the RT difference score which had been assessed on the central cue task) from the corresponding mean RT in each cue condition for each participant.
19 molecular signals were chosen to characterize changes in signaling network activity in response to each cue condition [see Additional file 1].
Consider, for example, a simultaneous discrimination task in which a rewarded cue (A+) and a nonreward cue (B−) are presented in a spatial arrangement with each cue in a different location.
Participants were instructed to recall a specific memory in response to each cue word.
The participants' task was to generate, and briefly describe, a specific personal event relating to the participants' future in response to each cue word.
Latencies were significantly shorter in the fixed-target task (Mann–Whitney comparison between fixed-target and each cue in cued-target, P < 0.02 in each case).
With comparable data, the early peak of target/nontarget selectivity was significantly stronger in the fixed-target task (see Fig. 6 C, colored lines above x-axis; proportion of selective cells in fixed-target task compared with data sets for each cue in cued-target task, McNemar's test, P < 0.05).
Finally, participants were allowed to give either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of each cue.
The current model of three-dimensional perception hypothesizes that the brain integrates the depth cues in a statistically optimal fashion through a weighted linear combination with weights proportional to the reliabilities obtained for each cue in isolation (Landy, Maloney, Johnston, & Young, 1995).
