in directly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in directly" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a typographical error or a misinterpretation of "indirectly." Example: "He was indirectly involved in the decision-making process."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

There is no question of the state going in directly".

The New York Times

"With See It, they'll be able to tune in directly from a tweet.

Los Angeles Times

This is good for the horse to adapt first and not jumping in directly.

WikiHow

With the bag on its side, leaves can be raked in directly.

The New York Times

Of Boston's six goals, only one went in directly off a Bruin's stick.

The New York Times - Sports

comes out against these views he is striking, in directly, against the research organizations.

The New Yorker

And then, when we walked in, directly opposite were all my best mates, waving at us.

The Guardian - Sport

It doesn't look as though they would have broken in directly through the PlayStation Network.

The Guardian - Tech

The report emphasized the government's role in directly managing the economy, with a few nods to market-oriented policies.

The New York Times

"My father's harm is fading", asserts the speaker in "Directly", and this sums up the quieter tone.

The Guardian - Books

It would also give the Federal Reserve Board a lead role in directly supervising many of the largest financial conglomerates.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Whenever possible, replace "in directly" with more idiomatic expressions such as "directly into", "immediately", or rephrase the sentence for clarity. Consider whether 'directly' is needed at all, as sometimes 'in' alone suffices.

Common error

A common mistake is placing "directly" after "in" when a more natural construction would involve placing "directly" before the verb or using "directly into" to show movement or direction. Pay attention to how adverbs modify verbs to avoid awkward phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in directly" functions as an adverbial modifier, though its usage is generally considered incorrect. It appears intended to describe how an action is performed or the manner in which something occurs. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "in directly" appears with some frequency across various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, it is not correct in standard written English. Its intended purpose is often to emphasize immediacy or direct involvement, but more appropriate alternatives like "directly", "directly into", or "immediately" should be used to avoid awkward phrasing and maintain grammatical correctness. Consider the context and choose a more idiomatic expression for clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

directly into

Switches the order of the words and adds 'into' for a clearer sense of direction or insertion.

straight into

Emphasizes immediacy and lack of intermediary steps, adding 'straight' for intensity.

right into

Similar to 'straight into', but 'right' can also imply correctness or suitability.

immediately into

Replaces 'directly' with 'immediately' to focus on the timing of an action.

instantly into

Stresses the speed of entry or involvement.

without intermediaries

Uses a longer phrase to highlight the absence of intermediate steps or parties.

personally

Focuses on the involvement of a person without any mediation.

firsthand

Emphasizes direct experience or knowledge.

on one's own

Highlights individual action without assistance or delegation.

unassisted

Focuses on the lack of external help.

FAQs

What does "in directly" mean?

The phrase "in directly" is not standard English. It's often used when the intended meaning is 'directly' or 'directly into', suggesting a lack of intermediaries or immediate involvement. Consider using "directly" or "directly into" for better clarity.

Is it grammatically correct to say "in directly"?

No, "in directly" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in formal English. Better alternatives include "directly" or rephrasing the sentence to use a more appropriate construction.

What are some alternatives to "in directly"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "directly into", "immediately", "personally", or "without intermediaries" to convey a similar meaning more clearly.

How can I avoid using "in directly" in my writing?

Review your sentences to see if you can replace "in directly" with a single word like "directly" or "immediately". Alternatively, restructure the sentence for better flow and clarity, possibly using "directly into" or another suitable preposition.