in detailed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'in detail' is correct and usable in written English.
It usually means to provide a precise, thorough account of something. For example, "She explained the entire process in detail, ensuring everyone had a clear understanding of what was required."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Everyone's hair is elaborately coiffed, often in detailed cornrows.

The New York Times - Arts

Its failings should be exposed in detailed published critiques.

The Guardian

He was no believer in detailed controls and restrictive centralisation.

The Economist

But the White House has no interest in detailed talks about permissible testing and deployments.

The New York Times

Their quotes are often touchy-feely but lacking in detailed solutions.

The Guardian - Opinion

Companies and individuals are named in detailed annexes to the resolution.

The Guardian

They say in detailed court statements that they were tortured by Muammar Gaddafi's security forces.

The Guardian

They are now more involved in detailed planning and are empowered to innovate.

The Guardian

A specialist subcommittee of the board can engage in detailed study and discussion.

The Guardian

Behind the scenes, Clinton has been involved in detailed discussions about campaign strategy.

The New Yorker

"In the past, people were more interested in detailed specifications of lots and lots of products," Ms. Chen said.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the grammatically correct phrase "in detail" instead of "in detailed". "In detail" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb to indicate thoroughness.

Common error

Avoid using the adjective "detailed" directly after the preposition "in". Instead, use the adverbial phrase "in detail" or rephrase to use "detailed" correctly, such as "a detailed explanation".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in detailed" functions as an attempted adverbial modifier, aiming to describe the manner in which an action is performed or a state exists. However, as pointed out by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "in detail".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

Despite its common appearance, the phrase "in detailed" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "in detail". While Ludwig shows several examples of its usage, the prevalence of "in detailed" doesn't make it right. The phrase aims to convey thoroughness, but its incorrect grammar undermines its effectiveness, particularly in formal writing. When aiming for precision, stick to "in detail" or consider alternatives like "thoroughly" or "comprehensively" for a more grammatically sound expression. As Ludwig AI also highlights, the phrase is not correct, despite its usage in several contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in detail

Omits the adjective "detailed", correcting the grammatical structure while retaining the core meaning.

in depth

Uses a more common phrase to convey a similar idea of thoroughness.

in a detailed manner

Rephrases the idea to explicitly state the manner in which something is done.

with detail

Emphasizes the presence of detailed information.

detailedly

Uses the adverbial form to describe the manner in which something is done.

thoroughly

Replaces the phrase with a single adverb indicating completeness and attention to detail.

comprehensively

Similar to "thoroughly", but emphasizes the scope and inclusiveness of the information.

extensively

Focuses on the broadness and depth of coverage.

meticulously

Highlights the careful and precise nature of the detailing.

exhaustively

Implies a complete and thorough examination, leaving no detail unaddressed.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "in detailed"?

The correct phrase is "in detail". The word "detailed" is an adjective, and "in detailed" is ungrammatical in most contexts.

Can I use "detailedly" instead of "in detailed"?

While "detailedly" is a valid adverb, it's not commonly used. A more natural and widely accepted alternative is "in detail".

What does "in detail" mean?

The phrase "in detail" means thoroughly, completely, and with attention to all particulars.

Is there a difference between "in detail" and "with detail"?

While both phrases relate to providing specifics, "in detail" typically modifies a verb, indicating how something is done (e.g., "explain in detail"). "With detail" often describes something that contains many specifics (e.g., "a report with detail").