We completed 24 in-depth error analyses before freezing the system for evaluation.
This is consistent with the fact that all M 7 earthquakes predicted by the model have occurred as shown in Fig. 9, with in a maximum depth error of 50 km.
Owing to the convolution operation in the utilized algorithm, the etching depth error is insensitive to the etching rate fluctuations of the ion beam, thereby reducing the requirement for the etching stability of the ion system.
These were defined as the amplitude of initial erroneous movements (early bias) and the difference between the lateral hand and ball position as the virtual ball passed the hand in depth (final error).
The phengite eclogite layer was not identified with the method of traditional K-means clustering in the depth Section 1728.3 1730.7 miles, and there were several slight depth errors in the rock transition section.
Even in sequences with high read depth, errors can be introduced in assembly: the frequency of such errors depends on genome, algorithm, and the error rate of the underlying sequencing method (Haiminen et al. 2011).
Another key result in this in-depth analysis of error was the finding that error rate (1.07%) should be seen in the light of the large number of erroneous sequences (89.91%) in the dataset.
The Table 2 also includes the targets numbered as 4, 5 and 6 as shown in Fig. 9b, with maximum error of −2.34 cm in depth and maximum error of 2.3 cm in lateral positions.
The large number of reads allowed an in-depth analysis of errors, and we found that PCR-induced errors composed the vast majority of non-organism derived species variants, an observation that has significant implications for sequence clustering of similar high-throughput data.
The in-depth examination of errors by IMCI-trained health workers via graphical pathway analysis allowed us to pinpoint problems in how health workers applied the guidelines, and thus gives a view into the decision-making process we have not previously seen in the published literature.
The Table 1 also includes the targets numbered as 4, 5 and 6 considered in Fig. 8b, showing the error in depth as −0.38 and −0.785 cm lateral error.
