Exact(5)
In comparison with the youngest age group (23 34), the odds of abstinence were higher in all the other older age groups.
However, elderly women with BC are currently undertreated in comparison with the youngest, and this leads to a considerable decrease in specific survival [ 12- 14].
The oldest age group (≥85 years) had an OR of 5.64 (95% CI 4.66 6.81) in comparison with the youngest (16 44 years).
> -wrap-foot> The changes in rates of impaired problems were significantly different in the oldest group (50 80 years old) in comparison with the youngest (16 29 years old) in both sites, although in opposite directions from each other.
Although there was no difference between the three age groups in terms of the average category endorsed, this item was significantly easier to endorse for the oldest group of patients in comparison with the youngest group (difference = 0.78 logits, t(2803) = 6.26, p < 0.01).
Similar(55)
Moreover, the older group exhibited a delayed onset activity of gluteus medius and tibialis anterior muscles as well as a slower velocity and lesser backward displacement of COP trajectories in comparison with the younger group.
The probability of condom use was higher among older adolescents in comparison with the younger ones.
Patients ⩾70 years old had significantly higher REM in comparison with the younger age group (50 69 years) for all the models.
The TID adolescents were also rated significantly lower than the normative groups on emotional/ behavioural limitations, mental health, time impact on parents and self esteem (in comparison with the younger normative group only).
Possibilities to perform optimal surgery for stage III patients aged over 65 years in comparison with the younger ones decreased – only two thirds of all patients aged over 65 years were debulked optimally.
These findings are consistent with the observations of a progressive increase in the G0/G1 phase (P<0.05, aged SCs versus young SCs, at 24 h), and moreover, of a reduction in the S-phase proportion in the cell cycle in the aged SCs in comparison with the young SC controls (P<0.05, at 24, and at 48 h; Figure 2c).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com