Because of the importance of Butterworth filters in the revised Standards, the theory of Butterworth filters is reviewed and the formulae for Butterworth filters given in both revised Standards are derived.
Task-focussed activity was relatively high in both revised (73.9%), and unrevised paper discussions (69.5%), but, in absolute terms, the task-focussed activity in the revised paper discussions was double as high as in the unrevised paper discussions (P < .000).000
However, we acknowledge that it can be confusing and, for this reason, we are providing a more detailed explanation including the Kunte et al. reference in both the revised Results section and the legend of Figure 2.
During revision surgery no metallosis, soft tissue cysts or solid masses were observed, although postoperative histopathological analyses showed chronic inflammatory signs including synovial hyperplasia en some metallosis in both patients revised for persistent pain, indicating adverse local tissue reaction to metal debris.
As stated above, we initially shared the reviewers' concerns that the greater degree of condensation observed in the TIRF experiments might be due to formation of secondary structure, and this was stated (both in the revised and original submission) as our reasoning for using force spectroscopy (magnetic tweezers) with wild-type, unlabeled SSB.
That new data is in shown in revised Figure 6H.
During their re-presenting of graphic and non-graphic information into EFL written discourse, they thought of structure, vocabulary, or world knowledge required to match their intended meaning in both rewriting, revising, and editing stage.
First, the prior two months payroll numbers were revised up by 44,000 in total -- in the revised data, both June and July saw solid gains of 245K.
The results were also included in the revised text ("both ZNF644 and WIZ-binding sequences… with full-length recombinant proteins").
As can be seen in Figure 6D, F in the revised manuscript, both Brn1 (condensin) and Rts1 (PP2arearefficientlyly recruited to this site, and Ipl1 (CPC) less so.
We have stressed these points in the revised manuscript both with the additional of new data and with modifications to the text.
