This is a problem not just for those protein items I was binning at the start of last week, before my experiment, but also for things that you cook – most really good ways to use stuff up involve pastry, potatoes, eggs, taking that thing, whatever it is, and turning it into a larger thing, often in the shape of a pie.
Say "'One out of four' or 'one of the four' equal parts of pizza" (for example) to be clear in grouping parts as fractions of a larger thing which is very different in meaning from "one group of four things" which are not in that case being interpreted to represent fractions.
"One of the main points of the experiment was to take something that is familiar, like where a large thing is in space, and show that quantum mechanics applies to large things as well as the microscopic world".
Or maybe it is just about putting things where they belong, some illusory notion about the order found in small things leading to an order in larger things.
It's worth considering, in a larger sense, the things many companies are doing today that don't fit with their missions.
But the crisis of moral values is such that we should simply recognise and rejoice in the good wherever it is to be found, while continuing to converse about whether it has its place in a larger scheme of things.
"But if you're in a larger situation, the best thing you can do is just have a vision and don't hide it," added Watts.
Larson puts the Antarctic voyages of Roald Amundsen, Robert Scott and Ernest Shackleton in a larger scientific context: the important thing is not who reached the pole first, but who did the best field research along the way.
The academics believe, however, that their approach does bring something extra and they are freer than academics in the UK to see things in a larger framework.
But in a larger (and more advanced) society, things will be different.
