Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSentence No, the phrase "impute for" is not a correct or commonly used phrase in written English.
The verb "impute" means to attribute or ascribe something to someone or something, and it is usually followed by the preposition "to." Example: The blame was imputed to the negligent party. In this sentence, "imputed to" is correct and means that the blame was attributed or assigned to the negligent party. Alternatively, you could use "impute" as a verb without a preposition, as in "The crime was imputed to the suspect." This means that the suspect was believed to be responsible for the crime. But using "impute for" is not standard usage and would likely confuse readers.
Exact(11)
We used combined inferences from multiple imputations to impute for the missing data in the important variables of study interest.
Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) approach for categorical variables was used to impute for 'socio-economic status' and 'looking for a paid job', which had 1.3% and 12.4% missing values, respectively.
Under missing at random assumption, we impute for the missing data at every stage depending on the data available at that point in time.
Hence, procedures to impute for missing data were not needed.
We therefore decided to impute for missing values.
For secondary end points, the last observation carried forward method was used to impute for weeks without SBM data.
Similar(49)
Imputing values for proxy subjects is a possible option for future analyses.
In the US GWAS dataset genotypes were imputed for 15 SNPs using the IMPUTE software.
In 'passive imputation' a value X* is imputed for X and then X2 is imputed as (X*).
Effectiveness GSI was imputed for the repeated measurement data, and after the imputation the AUC was constructed from the imputed values using equation (4) given in the Appendix.
Missing data were imputed for discrimination and CES-D using the individual mean imputation method, which imputes a value based on how a subject responds to other questions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com