Sentence examples for imputable to an increase from inspiring English sources

We hypothesized that the delayed growth of HIF2α tumours and the simultaneous necrosis of fast-growing HIF2α(1 485) nodules could be respectively imputable to an increase and a defect in the angiogenic process.

Nevertheless, the decrease in cell growth at basal conditions in wt cMSCs cannot be imputable to an increase in cell apoptosis as shown in Supplementary Figure 2.1, where the percentage of Annexin-V+ cMSCs (early apoptosis) is comparable in wt and Egr-1−/− mice at both 24 and 48 hours (P = 0.33 at 24 hours; P = 0.37 at 48 hours).

The resulting estimate of 1.8 poly(A) sites/gene is comparable to previous ones [ 4, 5] with a slight increase for mouse imputable to an expanded mouse EST database.

An event is not an action unless it is imputable to an agent who has a durable identity.

This is imputable to a publication bias that is detected and to the fact that more sophisticated methods and more controls can be used once a sufficient time span is available.

Its ipse-identity is what accounts for its unique ability to initiate something new and imputable to a self, be it oneself or another, as agent.

At last, the relation between BMI and tumour response seems linear, suggesting the correlation we observed is not exclusively imputable to a low response rate in the category of patients with the lowest BMI.

Although emerging studies maintain that SOD1-G93A microglia display a disease-specific transformation not classically imputable to a typical M1 or M2 phenotype (Nikodemova et al., 2013), this shift seems to occur exactly when the disease accelerates (Beers et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013).

This leads to an increase in Δ.

Revenues increased from $3.554 billion to $5.115 billion, an increase of 44percentt.

The statistically significant correlations between expression evaluated by cDNA microarray and Real Time PCR for FGFR4 (r = 0.57, p = 0.0008), FBLN2 (r = 0.595, p = 0.0004), ESR1 (r = 0.87, p = 0.0000008), ERBB2 (r = 0.754, p = 0.000002) clearly supports the fact that such a modulation is not imputable to technical artifacts, but represents a real biological phenomenon.