Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Curiously, though, the September 3rd event was marked by a single impulsive P wave with a coda of noisy reverberations — the signature of a powerful explosion.
Examining gender across groups, we found that girls who committed suicide were significantly more vulnerable (OR = 3.5, CI = 1.9-6.3, p = .01) and that they were non-significantly more impulsive (p = .05) than female accident victims.
Similar(58)
As far as we know, the impulsive p-Laplacian boundary value problems at resonance on the half-line have not been investigated.
By using the continuous theorem of Ge and Ren and constructing suitable Banach spaces and operators, we investigate the existence of solutions for an impulsive p-Laplacian boundary value problem with integral boundary condition at resonance on the half-line.
Polygenic risk for ADHD showed a positive association with ADHD traits (hyperactive-impulsive, p =.0039; inattentive, p =.037).
In this case, low impulsives chose the immediate reward less often than high impulsives (P < 0.001).
However, when the delayed amount was high, low impulsives chose the immediate reward less often than high impulsives (P < 0.01).
They scored higher on impulsive behavior (p = 0.005), restrained eating (p < 0.001) and parental corporal punishment (p = 0.03), but these psychological factors were not related to stress-induced food intake/choice.
Throughout this paper, we always assume that the impulsive jumps P k and Q k satisfy (referring to [28 37]) P k ( x * ) = 0 a n d Q k ( y * ) = 0, k ∈ N, i.e., P ̄ k ( x * ) = x * a n d Q ̄ ( y * ) = y *, k ∈ N, (3).
When y was corrupted by impulsive noise (p > 0), the reconstruction based on OMP-PKS (the blue line) gave very low PSNR, because OMP-PKS is designed with the assumption of bounded noise.
After adjusting for potential confounders (see above), OW/OB children reported more impulsive behaviors (p = 0.005, Table 4) than NW children, but parent-reported impulsive behaviors were not different.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com