Sentence examples for improving the priority setting from inspiring English sources

Ham and Coutler (2001), and WHO (2004) propose solutions for improving the priority setting processes.

Decision makers felt that the availability of quality information would improve the priority setting process (Martin et al. 2003a, b; Madden et al. 2005; Reeleder et al. 2005).

The analysis suggests that the Accountability for Reasonableness framework may be a useful tool for improving the priority-setting process in the context of poor resource settings.

Knowledge about current decision making practices within health care organizations is thus pivotal to improving priority setting processes [ 2, 7].

For example, program budgeting and marginal analysis, an economics-based approach, has been used with senior health care administrators in Canada and elsewhere to improve how priority setting optimises health and non-health benefits within available resources [ 13].

The improvement strategy should utilize rigorous research methods combining both normative and empirical methods to further analyze and correct past problems at the same time use the good practices to improve the current priority setting process for FMNCH interventions.

Using an innovative and robust mixed-methods approach, we have created a framework which attempts to provide much needed guidance to decision makers (and other stakeholders) to begin to improve the success of priority setting.

The findings may therefore indicate if there is need to improve priority setting processes, which influence decision making on how to achieve optimal coverage and access to life-saving obstetric services for pregnant women in the district.

Interviewees felt that the priority setting process improved their understanding of the budget process, of spending in other areas of the hospital, and of the accountability required in the budget.

This research fills a gap in knowledge by developing an evaluation process that can be used by healthcare managers to evaluate and improve priority setting.

Our study builds and expands upon previous works by, for the first time, describing a broad range of stakeholder's views about successful priority setting and synthesizing them into one conceptual framework that can be used by actual decision makers to improve priority setting.