Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
This prospective randomized study shows the positive effect of adding a statistical reviewer to the field-expert peers in improving manuscript quality.
In far too many cases, delaying manuscripts has less to do with improving manuscript quality and more with conflicting interests of various kinds.
I acknowledge help of my colleagues Dr James Donald Craik, Department of Biochemistry, and Dr Slava Malatiali, Department of Physiology, for their efforts in improving manuscript style and clarity.
Similar(57)
For instance, reviewers often require revisions to improve manuscript quality.
We thank Editor Hiroshi Takenaka and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved manuscript.
We would also like to thank the reviewers for their insightful comments that resulted in an improved manuscript.
We have shown that the addition of a supplementary statistical reviewer improves manuscript quality during the editorial process.
OM MAMG H-JM LAFF MB JWMB RPMAC discussed and improved manuscript.
The authors thank the reviewers for their many suggestions that contributed to a much improved manuscript.
Reviewer #3: This is a much improved manuscript that is now easier to read and understand.
When reviews identified areas in need of improvement, only half of the comments led to improved manuscripts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com