The analysis in Subsection 4.1 showed that we can only expect improvements in the sum of complex operations from TPE precoding per coherence period in certain scenarios.
However, if no subcarrier is assigned to S k, its available transmit power cannot be used to improve the sum rate R. Therefore, some kind of post-processing is required that checks for possible improvements of sum rate R.
A complete response was defined as complete resolution of disease in all three body compartments, and a partial response was defined as ≥50% improvement in the sum of the three assessments with ≥30% improvement in the skin, no worsening lymph nodes or Sézary cells, and no new tumors.
On the other hand, there is significant improvement in the sum rate once UEs resort to intelligent detection by employing the low-complexity interference-aware receivers.
There is a slight improvement in the sum rate at medium SNR when the restriction of low resolution (LTE quantized precoders) is relaxed, i.e., eNodeB employs MF EGT precoders; however, there is a significant improvement in the sum rate when the restriction of EGT is eliminated, i.e the eNodeB employs MF precoders.
With this, at every M inter frames, user k in cell i finds cell (i_{k}^{ast }) that achieves the largest improvement in the sum of log throughputs of the users in ({mathcal {U}}_{i}) and ({mathcal {U}}_{i_{k}^{ast }}) if user k is offloaded to cell (i_{k}^{ast }).
Intra-cell user association: At every M intra frames, small cell i chooses user k ⋆ in ({mathcal {V}}_{i}) (({mathcal {W}}_{i})) that achieves the largest improvement in the sum of log throughputs of all users in ({mathcal {U}}_{i}) if it moves to ({mathcal {W}}_{i}) (({mathcal {V}}_{i})).
A subcarrier will be moved to a different allocation set N k if this leads to an improvement in the sum rate R. To keep computational effort low, the available power will be distributed uniformly among subcarriers for the computation of rates r n,k.
Patients receiving bibrocathol 2%% showed greater improvement in the sum score than the placebo patients (p < 0.0001, Cohen's effect size d = 0.73).
The probability of feeding everyone given no interventions was subtracted from the probability of success given all four interventions, truncated at an improvement of 4%% (the sum of the individual minimum improvements).
