Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
A suitable switching mechanism with performance improvement coefficient is proposed to determine when it is worthwhile to utilize THS.
In the FME group, most participants show improvement (coefficient >1), except in precision where one quarter had improvement coefficients slightly lower than 1.
The improvement coefficient was calculated as the quotient of measure's postintervention score and the baseline score, in such manner that progress is reflected through increase of the measure (>1, improvement; = 1, no change; <1, regress).
Similar(57)
Results of the renormalization factors and the improvement coefficients are presented as a function of mQa for various improved gauge actions as well as the plaquette action.
We show that all the improvement coefficients are determined free from infrared divergences.
We present the results for a perturbative determination of mass dependent improvement coefficients ν, rs, cE and cB in a relativistic heavy quark action, which we have designed to control mQa errors by extending the on-shell O(a) improvement program to the case of mQ≫ΛQCD, where mQ is the heavy quark mass.
We carry out a perturbative determination of mass dependent renormalization factors and O(a) improvement coefficients for the vector and axial vector currents with a relativistic heavy quark action, which we have designed to control mQa errors by extending the on-shell O(a) improvement program to the case of mQ⪢ΛQCD with mQ the heavy quark mass.
The improvement coefficients of smoothness, speed, and precision are shown in Figure 3.
The smoothness improvement coefficients show a significant difference between the two groups with median 1.4 (IQR = 0.4) for FME and median 1 (IQR = 0.3) for NFE (U = 9, P < 0.01).
The NFE group, on the other hand, shows less improvement or even regress in smoothness and speed, respectively, while in precision results are largely polarized, with one quarter of participants having improvement coefficients higher than 2 and one quarter lower than 0.5.
An improvement in Coefficient of Performance ranging between 8.89% and 13.69% for different inlet velocities is observed for new configuration over the conventional configuration.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com