Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
We thank Editor Hiroshi Takenaka and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved manuscript.
We would also like to thank the reviewers for their insightful comments that resulted in an improved manuscript.
We are grateful to the PLoS ONE reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions, which resulted in a much improved manuscript.
OM MAMG H-JM LAFF MB JWMB RPMAC discussed and improved manuscript.
The authors thank the reviewers for their many suggestions that contributed to a much improved manuscript.
Reviewer #3: This is a much improved manuscript that is now easier to read and understand.
Similar(45)
When reviews identified areas in need of improvement, only half of the comments led to improved manuscripts.
For instance, reviewers often require revisions to improve manuscript quality.
We have shown that the addition of a supplementary statistical reviewer improves manuscript quality during the editorial process.
As mentioned previously, very few randomised trials have assessed interventions to improve manuscript quality after peer review.
FC prepared the manuscript, XW and JW improved the manuscript.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com