We improved the revised version of the manuscript by adding additional data and discussed our study in the context of published work more comprehensively.
In addition to the points raised by the reviewers, we have also improved the revised manuscript by including an additional figure panel documenting the ratio of CDT1 geminin protein expression in cells treated with RO‐3306.
Fix the kinks, improve the funnies, revise it, etc. Practice makes perfect.
Individual categories in the SAM test were analyzed and, as seen in Fig. 3, significantly improved when the revised template was used.
YD coordinated the project and revised the manuscript; YD, CZ, JY and MQY gave suggestions to improve the method and revised the manuscript.
HYT, KKL and JG proposed suggestions to improve the study and revised the manuscript.
TT, MK, SW and SK proposed suggestions to improve the study and revised the manuscript.
We trust that you will be able to significantly improve the clarity of the revised version.
Authors' response: We were very pleased to read your supporting comments on our study and felt that your suggestions were very helpful in assisting us to improve the quality of the revised manuscript.
To improve, we revised the figure showing the sequence of recombinant proteins and additions to the reaction.
