improper reasoning

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "improper reasoning" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to flawed or incorrect thinking or argumentation. Example: The prosecutor's case fell apart due to the defense's successful attack on the witness's improper reasoning.

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It is improper reasoning to conclude or assume that any given number of true samples proves to a certainty what may be next.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The most notorious cases of improper uses of such values involve travesties of scientific reasoning, where the intrusion of contextual values led to an intolerant and oppressive scientific agenda with devastating epistemic and social consequences.

SEP

Improper integrals.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Improper Integrals.

Stanford University

This was improper.

Independent

— the Improper Benefits bowl.

The New York Times

Good reasoning.

The Guardian - Sport

The reasoning?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

His reasoning?

The New York Times - Sports

My reasoning?

The New York Times - Tech

Reasoning: E.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When critiquing someone's argument, use "improper reasoning" to specifically point out flaws in their logic rather than broadly dismissing their conclusion. For example, "The argument fails because it relies on improper reasoning and a misrepresentation of the facts."

Common error

Avoid using "improper reasoning" to describe disagreements based on differing values or opinions. "Improper reasoning" refers to specific flaws in logic, not subjective differences in perspective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "improper reasoning" functions as a noun phrase that describes a flaw or defect in the way someone is thinking or arguing. As highlighted by Ludwig, the term indicates that the line of thought does not adhere to sound logical principles.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

25%

Academia

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Wiki

25%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "improper reasoning" is a phrase used to denote flawed or incorrect thinking, functioning as a noun phrase often employed to critique arguments by exposing their logical fallacies. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and suitable for written English. Although its occurrence is relatively rare, "improper reasoning" finds application across diverse domains, including news, academic discourse, and scientific analysis, reflecting its versatility in capturing failures in logical thinking. Recognizing and avoiding "faulty logic" is a key aspect of effective communication and sound decision-making.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

faulty logic

Emphasizes the flawed structure of the reasoning process itself.

flawed reasoning

Highlights the presence of defects or imperfections in the reasoning.

unsound judgment

Focuses on the lack of soundness or validity in the judgment made.

invalid reasoning

Indicates that the reasoning does not follow logically correct principles.

fallacious argument

Refers to an argument that contains a fallacy or deceptive element.

erroneous deduction

Highlights a mistake in the deductive process.

defective logic

Emphasizes that the logic used is not working correctly.

poor reasoning skills

Focuses on a lack of proficiency in reasoning.

illogical thinking

Highlights the absence of logical consistency in thought.

irrational thought

Focuses on the lack of reason or rationality behind the thinking.

FAQs

How can I identify "improper reasoning" in an argument?

Look for logical fallacies, unsupported claims, or inconsistencies in the presented evidence. Recognizing these flaws can help you identify "faulty logic" and assess the validity of the argument.

What are some common types of "improper reasoning"?

Common types include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, appeals to emotion, and false dilemmas. Understanding these fallacies can help you avoid them in your own reasoning and recognize them in others'.

What's the difference between "improper reasoning" and a simple mistake?

"Improper reasoning" refers to a fundamental flaw in the logical process, while a mistake might be a simple factual error or oversight. The former undermines the entire argument, while the latter may only weaken it.

How can I improve my own reasoning skills to avoid "improper reasoning"?

Practice critical thinking, learn about common logical fallacies, and seek feedback from others on your arguments. Actively analyzing information and considering alternative perspectives can help refine your reasoning abilities and minimize errors.